Definition: And the wings of the cherubims [were] twenty cubits long: one wing [of the one cherub was] five cubits, reaching to the wall of the house: and the other wing [was likewise] five cubits, reaching to the wing of the other cherub.

Explanation: Okay, let's break down this verse from 2 Chronicles 3:11. It’s a really fascinating and somewhat mysterious detail about God’s creation! Here’s what it means in simpler terms: Basically, this verse describes how large the wings of the two cherubim (which were incredibly powerful and divine creatures) were. Let's unpack it: “And the wings of the cherubims…” : This tells us we’re talking about two massive, ornate winged figures – think of them as giant, beautiful bird-like structures. “…were twenty cubits long…” : "Cubits" are a unit of measurement in ancient times (roughly equivalent to 12 inches). So, these wings were really big - 20 cubits long! That's a significant size. “one wing [of the one cherub was] five cubits, reaching to the wall of the house…” : This describes one wing on one of the cherubim. It stretched out 5 cubits (about 12 inches) – that is, it reached all the way up to the top of a wall in the house. “and the other wing [was likewise] five cubits, reaching to the wing of the other cherub.” : This describes the other wing on another cherubim. It stretched out 5 cubits as well – again, reaching up to the top of a wall. What's the significance? This is where it gets a bit more symbolic and theological. The verse suggests that these two cherubs were incredibly powerful and capable. They weren’t just decorations; they were actively involved in creating and maintaining the world God made. It implies a level of divine activity and importance that was very significant for those ancient times. Important Note: This is a complex passage, and there's still some debate among scholars about its exact meaning. It’s often seen as an example of how ancient texts can be layered with symbolism and interpretation over time. --- Do you want me to: Explain another verse? Discuss the historical context surrounding this passage? Explore what it might symbolize in a broader theological sense?